What Is The Rosemont Theatre Orchestra Pit

movie-cats return

Returning to the "eternal theme, the theme " movie cats ", share-ka accumulated discoveries that have found and documented.

01). First, stop our research on the political-satire films by William Richert "Winter - season killings" . Role in the hold, however, went nameless cat-actor rather "tiny" and "continuous", but in any case, still standing here and some incidental references and presenting something no accompanying details.

Koshak's still quite insolently "gushes cream from a cup ", a den of gangsters, straight from the table tamoshnego boss. However, at this for a representative of the cat family" Lafaille ended "... Some very strange woman-killer for some reason "soaked pussy" .

Anyway the movie itself is very strannenky. Very influential to this day "family Kennedy, then the same must have been a "happy" ...

I think all fans of "conspiracy" is to honor this film with their attention. Interesting "theory conspiracy, generously flavored with choicest paranoia, anointed with joy the hearts of any "conspiracy".

2002). Next, the cat-actor was found in the "classical" revenge-film Wes Craven "Last House on the Left" . But what! Indescribably wonderful "swarthy kotyashka" ! Has, moreover, piercing, burning "look" .

Well, something about myself wonder-movie, perhaps I will not say much, because, probably, literally everything, "film fans," and so it is well known. To me, a rather lovely film, but has "flaws" (for example, seems to me quite irrelevant blunt "gags" with stupid police officers in a film as something completely "by cash").

Although, I confess, "Italian variation" that "took Aldo Lado" , I like it so much more. Properly speaking, this is often now referred to as rip-off-om "The Last House on the Left, but not sure if it would be right to judge so severely ... Of course, the fact that some "plagiarism" deny the difficult, but at the same time, rip-off, it seems to me, yet close in semantic value for "not very much quality processing" and "Murder in the night train, in my opinion, pretty good work, which is not worse than the "original." In general, so I personally do "rip-off-om," this film does not want to call and stop in the wording on the respect-sensitive "Italian variation" :-)

This does not mean that I am right, does this mean - "what I want, and tossing."

Like, "is opinion ".

2003). In the film, Tom Laughlin (in the credits, we note as director, he claimed, as" TS Frank "and he who do not understand, and play a major role ) "Born restless " find a cat-actor was not an easy task at all, and is akin to something navrode" searching for a needle in a haystack, "but one hero, Hidden in the trash tank, a good closer, I still "spotted" .

bad, in my opinion, "biker" filmets. Anyway, not such a bore, like most ribbons in this category. It is a pity that the other movies "Billy Jack" , it seems, so far not been transferred.

04). His most notable "catch" this time, met my hyper-miracle-brilliant movie Joe D'Amato "Death smiles at killer" . Where, where, and only in this beautiful filmstrip cats-paws decent actors heritage. Pace, do not be an exaggeration to say that "cat theme through a thread runs through this entire movie from the intonation to kontseviny.

However, See for yourself ... To begin with, had the observation, as one individual "be worn out in the sun" . Judging by the expression "muzzle people, most likely, " a cat ".

Here "here" , seems to have cat stares (at least to me presumptuous me now seems that I can accurately guess the sex of cats, cats in the words of the muzzle and look, in this case, look, what appears to be "feminine" and some now believe that de "all negros on one person, but, in fact, it is not so simply need a little getting used to their appearance and then he easily and naturally it will be possible to distinguish one prick up "Black" from another, something like this, in fact, this is the case with cats, cats, of which it is quite possible to learn to differentiate only in appearance, though not always, because sometimes people do not always possible to accurately guess sex "without looking under the tail).

cat-actor, meanwhile, despite its seemingly entirely innocent and innocuous appearance, played very "controversial character" and sometimes rustle catching up fairly. For example, the rapidly soaring up in the athletic jump, she "prochuvstvenno snapped" woman in the neck. But, after this "attack", she "has reeled off" . That is a beast. Although in appearance and can not say that she is too straight and "terrible" (only deep in the eyes flicker some nasty shadows that give her unkind nature, in which she is phenomenal, "got used to" playing this role).

Well itself "Manner of movement" is also troubling her in the highest as suspicious and mysterious furtively "zloveschestyu" .

as the quintessence of "straightening threat "- a" battle scene "near the end of tape when a little pussy play with a person," brother of Greta. "All of it flashed very quickly, but at the cost of the titanic efforts all the same I was able to capture naiprekrasneyshuyu cat-actress in this "climax" .

short, bright, expressive, catchy role, "worthy of stormy and prolonged applause.

While watching, I confess, so enthusiastic and wanted to wail:

- Bravo, pussy! Kill them all!

Black Spots On Lcd Tv Screen

INXS - Need You Tonight

I would first write something misanthropic about "gay" or there about "Christians", but somehow changed his mind. Type, the weather is great and you do not want to spoil the mood of the people. And indeed, in my opinion, "bad thoughts lead to evil deeds," so that must make themselves to think "positively". Better here, in general, share-ka one of his favorite songs:

"INXS - Need You Tonight"

"Popsnya, of course ... This single, in their time, even led the hit parade of sales of U.S. .. But I still really like :-)

There's A Lump On My Bum Very Painful

"self" and "pride"

Many seem to be often confused with one another the notion of "self" and "pride." Yes I am, of course, is no exception. Once before, "did not betray this particular value, but then suddenly shot through the brain thought it was wrong after all mixed into one pile-mala "Self" and "pride" because it's totally different "values".

And the fact that theirs meaning wrongly interpreted, leads to the generation of various "misunderstandings." Sometimes, for example, often talk about people that de such a no respect for others, because "too many thinks about himself" (thus implicitly assuming that he does so "is not the case"). Whereas, in my opinion, correct in such cases say, such a not respect others as "too much like himself."

What I have in mind when they built the assertion in this way?

And that, perhaps, respect other people can only he who respects himself a . Because, let's ask ourselves a reasonable question, where does "respect"? Here, for me, all easier than ever: it comes "from the mind." "Respect" itself may only he who does nothing "shameful" or in the presence of others, or secretly thereof. "Knowledge" makes "respect".

talk a little more "deployed" Man thinks of himself, "analyzes what he did, and this" thinking "settling" solids ", gives him some" knowledge "that can provide it sense of "self", if to this there are some reasonable cause.

In turn, this by itself implies the fact that the person indeed "nothing to be ashamed of," can not respect someone "is not the case." For it is not the case - it is always "insincerity" and "insincerity" - it is always a "conscious hypocrisy ", which is nothing less than" true. "Man is consciously telling a lie, again, can not be myself for it to" respect "as" a lie "- is not a cause for "pride", but something in one way or another "shameful" (where "less" when "more", but "nonetheless").

Consequently, people are not respecting people "is not the case" can not and a "respected" because he has no excuse for this, but the reason to not respect yourself still there.

"Love" same - not "the mind" is something "emotional", which sometimes contradicts the arguments of reason. Type, known as that "love of evil - a calm." Even notebooks scoundrels oddly enough, sometimes "love". And as the cases when they themselves love, and not "rare", but rather the "norm".

So it turns out that, unlike human having earned "self-esteem," man "proud" may very well not to respect others is not the case "because the leadership does not" mind "and" emotion ".

Bread Made With Raisin Juice

faith "conditional" and "unconditional"

Shalaya baby, little thought breaks to rush after him, so I will say something else. In order to sort of sort of opinion to "of their own observations" , I would like to try to move a cursory explanation why I personally raised there "beliefs" seem to be something from the category of "not very much good" (or at least case, one of the "points"). Not sure if I can express in a concise format pomyslennoe, but still try sdyuzhit ...

start, probably better all from the very beginning, from this and start ... What is "faith"? In my opinion, "faith" - a representation of a person that is taking place. And, by itself, it is "not good not bad. "The trick is that" faith "is not something" homogeneous ", it can be different. For example, one could easily notice that sometimes it is the" true "and sometimes" false. "

I mean, the belief in what is "- is one thing, but faith in what is not - totally different, is not it?

Whatever it was, but personally I think that faith "In what is not - is the direct connivance of Lies and Lying is not something" good. "

From this arises the following question ... How do I determine what kind of faith "true" and what is "false" (that is to say, "false")?

Well, as I understand it, the "true" faith - it is nothing like good old "knowledge." Something affordable comprehend the mind and something "verifiable."

And no matter what said "believers", whatever "evidence" and "evidence" vehemently not shaken, but even under their own ideas, to comprehend the mind of God can not, accordingly, any "knowledge" about him, too, have not. Since no "comprehension" no "knowledge" can not be.

So it turns out that their faith in God represents a certain conventionality in which they blindly "believe", without having to then somehow seeing "Knowledge".

And, then, in any case, such a belief is not the nature of "true" because the truth is always unconditional.