"empty" - does not mean "Useless" (secret and obvious benefit of "emptiness")
all heard that "everything is relative, but some refer to this expression is fairly skeptical. And, characteristically, "the outlook is, the more skeptical frame of mind."
However, in my opinion, there is no need to go to the hard-nosed about a one-sided stereotypes, if there are some quite clear "alternative", which they say is that things are not so "clearly" how "relatively". And this "relativity" If you look closely, there is literally everywhere, we only need to think carefully and try to take a fresh look at the famous things or phenomena.
For example, I would like to rehabilitate such a widespread phenomenon of "emptiness", which is usually regarded as something utterly "Useless" (that is to say, "worthless"). This terribly popular stereotype is so powerful and so ubiquitous that "emptiness" used to characterize and other words, to make emphasis on quite specific properties (constituting, in their view, the essence of the stereotype). Samples of this "neglect" lots: "Blank generation", the "empty people", "empty head", "empty knowledge", "empty words", "empty space", "waste of time" and sput-holes and sput-Pyr.
But whether everything is uniquely "emptiness"? Is it no alternative "useless"?
In my opinion, "not." Rather might say, all "is not so." To begin with, that even in the human being, there are some "void" without which he would simply "unsustainable."
Or take, perhaps, another important for our everyday life example - absolutely any dwelling house. Agree that completely "sealed" homes would be built to the highest extent is absurd, because so that we could by them to "use", of course, we need to have some access to the interior, and to do all certainly need to make void-door. Because people can not seep through walls, but the "use" the door "emptiness" We very much "by force".
Availability of benefits, and is available in these "void" make them fit for "eat."
So I would not-so "unequivocally" belittling "the void". It can be very "useful" and therefore "good."
On the other hand, are quite clear and the reasons why people choose to ignore the "ambiguity", if any. First, apparently it is much easier to navigate in that they do not "respect" and absolutely "definitely." To-one "opinion" inspires "confidence" and "certainty" tends to be "comfortable" under the "certainty" (within, at least, eliminate the disturbing "confusion"). Secondly, many of the trite "confuse cause with the consequences. "As an example, a typical situation:" empty bottle "curse of the" void ", while forgetting that this is the same" emptiness "and let it" fill. " Do not be in the flask of "emptiness", it generally can not be anything "stuff."
That is, I think the main benefit of "emptiness" is that it provides a "use". And so that opportunity for some reason did not "use" myself "emptiness" in fact did not guilty.
She sort of "open" and ready to "use" and "fill" it - it is our task.
It turns out that the "evil" is not "void" itself , "evil" only in our impotence properly as the judges to "fill."
0 comments:
Post a Comment