faith "conditional" and "unconditional"
Shalaya baby, little thought breaks to rush after him, so I will say something else. In order to sort of sort of opinion to "of their own observations" , I would like to try to move a cursory explanation why I personally raised there "beliefs" seem to be something from the category of "not very much good" (or at least case, one of the "points"). Not sure if I can express in a concise format pomyslennoe, but still try sdyuzhit ...
start, probably better all from the very beginning, from this and start ... What is "faith"? In my opinion, "faith" - a representation of a person that is taking place. And, by itself, it is "not good not bad. "The trick is that" faith "is not something" homogeneous ", it can be different. For example, one could easily notice that sometimes it is the" true "and sometimes" false. "
I mean, the belief in what is "- is one thing, but faith in what is not - totally different, is not it?
Whatever it was, but personally I think that faith "In what is not - is the direct connivance of Lies and Lying is not something" good. "
From this arises the following question ... How do I determine what kind of faith "true" and what is "false" (that is to say, "false")?
Well, as I understand it, the "true" faith - it is nothing like good old "knowledge." Something affordable comprehend the mind and something "verifiable."
And no matter what said "believers", whatever "evidence" and "evidence" vehemently not shaken, but even under their own ideas, to comprehend the mind of God can not, accordingly, any "knowledge" about him, too, have not. Since no "comprehension" no "knowledge" can not be.
So it turns out that their faith in God represents a certain conventionality in which they blindly "believe", without having to then somehow seeing "Knowledge".
And, then, in any case, such a belief is not the nature of "true" because the truth is always unconditional.
0 comments:
Post a Comment